Log in Register

The Goncourt Brothers and Their Journal of 19th-Century Paris

For nearly half a century, two French writers sat down at the end of almost every day and recorded what they had seen, heard, read and felt. Edmond de Goncourt and his older brother Jules kept a joint diary from 1851 until Jules died in 1870, after which Edmond continued alone until his own death in 1896. The resulting text, published posthumously across nine volumes between 1887 and 1896, remains one of the most vivid personal records of 19th-century European literary life.

The journal functions as three documents at once. It is a candid memoir of two writers trying to establish themselves outside the commercial mainstream, a sprawling chronicle of Parisian society from the last years of Louis-Napoleon's Second Empire through the trauma of the Franco-Prussian War and the Paris Commune, and an intimate notebook of artistic commentary, theatrical gossip and literary criticism. Few other sources describe the Parisian salon, the auction room and the artist's studio with such immediacy.

Much of the diary entered the public domain long ago. Under the Australian Copyright Act 1968, literary works generally pass into the public domain seventy years after the death of the author. Jules died in 1870 and Edmond in 1896, which means Australian readers can consult their writings freely and legally, both in print editions held by major libraries and in digital form through modern aggregators.

For readers curious about 19th-century French letters, BnF Collection eBooks offers a curated doorway into the Goncourt universe alongside hundreds of other public-domain French texts, ranging from Stendhal and Balzac to obscure memoirs and travel narratives that rarely circulate in Anglophone bookshops.

Edmond and Jules: two writers, one notebook

The brothers came from an aristocratic Lorraine family that had lost most of its fortune by the time Edmond was born in 1822 and Jules three years earlier. Rejecting the administrative careers open to them, they turned to writing historical novels, watercolours, art criticism and theatrical reviews. Living together in a series of apartments in central Paris, they ate at the same restaurants, visited the same galleries and shared a single set of friends, so it made practical sense to keep a single diary between them.

Their collaboration was so close that scholars still debate who wrote which entry. The brothers worked on manuscripts side by side, and the journal reflects that merged sensibility. Where one voice reads and the other dictates, where one visits a salon and the other stays home writing, the diary captures the texture of a shared life. After Jules's death from syphilis in 1870, Edmond continued the notebook alone for another twenty-six years, increasingly lonely and increasingly sharp-tongued, until his own death on 16 July 1896.

A short table helps clarify how the two personalities complemented and contrasted.

Aspect Jules de Goncourt (1830–1870) Edmond de Goncourt (1822–1896)
Role in the journal Co-author until 1870; the more impulsive observer Co-author; sole author from 1870 to 1896
Notable interests Theatrical criticism, 18th-century history, Japanese art Art collecting, Impressionist painters, naturalistic fiction
Temperament Sociable, prone to emotional attachment Acerbic, protective of his privacy
Lasting contribution Shaping the journal's early tone and collaborative method Editing, expanding and publishing the complete text

The division is useful rather than absolute. Both brothers championed the same writers and painters, both frequented the same Parisian haunts, and both shared a relentless drive to capture what they called "the living moment" before memory could smooth it over.

A chronicle of Paris from the Second Empire to the Third Republic

Because the brothers wrote almost daily, the journal tracks the rhythms of Parisian life with unusual precision. Entries describe the glittering evenings at the salon of Princess Mathilde, the rehearsal rooms of the Comédie-Française, the auction houses where 18th-century furniture changed hands, the bohemian studios of Montmartre and the cafés of the boulevard. Readers encounter Flaubert, Zola, Daudet, Hugo and Tourgueniev as living presences rather than canonical names.

The political upheavals of the period are described from the inside. The Franco-Prussian War of 1870, the siege of Paris, the fall of the Second Empire and the bloody weeks of the Paris Commune in 1871 all appear as personal catastrophes rather than abstract historical events. Edmond's account of the burning of the Tuileries Palace during the Commune, and of his own flight from Paris with what he could salvage of his art collection, is among the most quoted passages in the journal.

The diary also records quieter but equally significant shifts: the arrival of Japanese woodblock prints in Parisian shops, the first Impressionist exhibitions, the slow rise of the naturalist novel and the transformation of the literary marketplace by serialised fiction and commercial publishing. Australian readers interested in how a national literary culture develops may find useful parallels here, particularly in the way Parisian writers in the 1860s and 1870s wrestled with the tension between popular success and artistic ambition.

The art world observed from the front row

The Goncourts were serious collectors and serious critics. Their journal records conversations with Manet, Degas, Monet and Renoir, as well as purchases, sales and the occasional bitter argument over a canvas. Edmond in particular was an early and consistent defender of the Impressionists, and his diary entries from the 1870s describe the hostile critical reception of their exhibitions with a mixture of contempt and exasperation.

The brothers also wrote perceptively about the older generation of painters, about the Salon system that governed official taste, and about the rising commercial market for 18th-century French decorative arts. Many entries read like miniature art criticism essays, complete with judgments about technique, colour and subject matter. A single afternoon's visit to a private collection could fill three pages with detailed descriptions of furniture, porcelain and drawings.

For readers in Australia, where public collections such as the Art Gallery of New South Wales and the National Gallery of Victoria hold significant holdings of 19th-century French works, these passages offer a rich documentary context. The journal describes the very objects, auctions and dealers that shaped European collections, several of which later crossed oceans and reappeared in museums far from Paris.

Style, method and the question of honesty

The Goncourt diary is famous for its style. Sentences are short and often aphoristic. Observations are filed with a kind of nervous precision, and personalities are reduced to a memorable gesture or phrase. The brothers prided themselves on what they called "écriture artiste," a literary language that aimed to reproduce sensation as directly as possible.

The honesty of the diary is a more complicated matter. Edmond revised and rewrote passages heavily before publication, and the printed text is therefore not a raw transcript of daily life but a carefully shaped literary artefact. Scholars have spent decades comparing manuscript drafts with printed editions and have identified layers of editing that soften, sharpen or sometimes invert earlier judgments. Readers approaching the journal as documentary evidence should keep this editorial history in mind.

There are also ethical questions. The brothers recorded intimate details about friends, lovers and acquaintances with a frankness that would today be considered invasive. Some entries destroyed friendships; others prompted protests. For modern readers, particularly those shaped by Australian privacy expectations and the principles of legislation such as the Privacy Act 1988, the Goncourts' unblinking candour can feel simultaneously thrilling and uncomfortable, a reminder of how much the norms of literary disclosure have shifted.

Legacy of the journal and the Prix Goncourt

The diary shaped two distinct legacies. The first was literary. Writers from Marcel Proust to André Gide cited the Goncourts as masters of observation and self-presentation, and the journal became a model for the modern literary memoir. Its influence can be traced in the autobiographical works of countless 20th-century writers, including Australian memoirists who have experimented with the daily-entry form.

The second was institutional. Edmond's will provided for the creation of an annual literary prize to be awarded to the best French prose work of the year, decided by a jury of writers rather than by academics or critics. The Prix Goncourt, first awarded in 1903, remains the most prestigious literary prize in France and reliably sends its winner to the top of the Parisian bestseller lists each autumn. Every November the announcement is covered in international media and frequently discussed in Australian newspapers that follow French literary culture.

Themes that often draw readers to the Goncourt diary:

The journal itself continues to be edited, translated and reinterpreted. New scholarly editions in French, English and other languages have made the text accessible to readers who do not read 19th-century French with ease, and digital projects have made individual entries searchable in ways the original print editions never allowed.

Public domain, Australian readers and digital access

For readers who want to read the Goncourt diary directly, the legal situation is straightforward. Both brothers died more than seventy years ago, which means their writings sit comfortably within the public domain under the Copyright Act 1968. No permission is required to read, download, print or quote from the text, and Australian libraries such as the National Library of Australia in Canberra and the State Library of Victoria in Melbourne hold both French editions and English translations that can be consulted on site.

Digital collections have widened this access further. The Goncourt text, together with the wider body of 19th-century French public-domain writing, is available to readers with a reliable internet connection through curated platforms. Anyone interested in the brothers' historical novels, their art criticism, their theatrical reviews and the diary itself can browse by author, genre or anthology, build a personal library, download EPUB files for offline reading and explore related titles suggested by curators.

Practical considerations for Australian readers include the following:

Australian readers curious about 19th-century French culture will find that the diary opens doors into rooms that still feel occupied, more than a century after the brothers set down their pens. Start with a single volume, keep a map of Paris at hand, and let the entries accumulate the way the Goncourts wrote them, a few pages at a time, until the texture of their world becomes familiar.